| Is There a Spirituality
Revolution?
Eley McAinsh, Director of the Living Spirituality
Network
and producer of the BBC's Radio Four program
"Something
Understood" talked at the Priory in October
2005 about the
growth of spirituality in the West, where traditional church life is
waning. Here is a brief summary of her talk.
Religion
and spirituality are news today as never before. They attract attention
so often that something must surely be going on. Perhaps traditional
religion is waning and spirituality is waxing.
The author David Tacey in his book
"The
Spirituality Revolution" contends that a great change is in fact
coming about. He thinks there is a truly spontaneous movement towards
things spiritual and their healing power for society. He writes:
This is not an escapist or otherworldly movement,
but a direct political and philosophical challenge to traditional
notions of sacredness and the holy.
Something new is undoubtedly happening - but
is it truly a spiritual revolution?
In their study of the English town of Kendal [1],
Paul Heelas and Linda Woodhead think that to qualify as a revolution the
burgeoning spirituality movement should have at least overtaken
traditional religion. They conclude that this is not the case:
... our findings show that even if a spiritual
revolution is underway, it is taking place within a realm of
activities which is in decline.
So whatever else we do, we must take claims for a
spiritual revolution with a pinch of salt. What is happening is in the
context of massive social, cultural, political, scientific, theological
and philosophical change over the last 100 years or so.
Sister Bernadette Flanagan of the Milltown
Institute perceives three groups involved in the growth of spirituality
today. First, there are young people who remain in touch with the Church
as an anchor in a stormy sea of change. Second, there are those who have
dismantled previous certainties and now seek to live out their questions
on the edge. Third are those who now have little or no connection with a
religious tradition.
It is the second group which the Kendal study
ignores. These people are developing their spirituality on the edges of
traditional religion. The revolution might still be young - but the
revolutionaries are clearly at work. As Sandra Schneiders writes:
The repudiation of institutional religion in
favor of personal spirituality is, for many people, the repudiation of
denominational belonging rather than of religion as such or of
religious traditions in their entirety [2].
The focus here is on this group, who might be
called "The New Believers" [3]. Spirituality
for them is primarily about bringing the whole person into a
relationship with God while at the same time having more questions than answers
about traditional Christian teaching. It is also less to do with the
funky things of New Age practices and more about finding a way into an
ever deeper encounter with the divine.
The New Believers are not wicked apostates. It's
just that their outlook and temperaments find traditional approaches
oppressive, morally suspect and spiritually unattractive [4].
They see themselves as having embarked upon a journey of faith, growth
and transformation.
The journey of the New Believers is into a
wilderness through which each person must perforce make his or her own
way. Mark Wallace writes:
Truth in religion begins with the willingness to
travel the unmarked path plotted by the spirit in the heart of each
person [5].
A facet of the spiritual life of the New Believer
is the risk of criticism from those who haven't recognised that the
meaning of the word "spirituality" has changed in popular
usage and is unlikely to revert to its traditional points of reference.
As David Hay wrote in the Roman Catholic periodical The Tablet:
The change amounts to a shrinkage of the meaning
of the word "religion" and the expansion of the term
"spirituality". Religion used to refer to the whole of the
human encounter with the divine, but has shrivelled down do denote
something like church-going.
If he's correct, then perhaps the Marxist
contention that revolution succeeds when the language of the old order
dies is to be given considerable credit.
But note that the death of the Church has been
greatly exaggerated. At best the jury is out on the question of the
Church's future as an institution. That, however, is not the main
concern of New Believers. They focus instead on building a nourishing
faith - a difficult task in itself, and made more testing by the
tendency of traditional religion to defend its turf with the harshest of
measures.
It is no longer sufficient for New Believers to
live in a religious bubble, isolated from the tides of human life. As
David Tacey says, those venturing on the new spiritual journey are
... only interested in a faith that has passed
through the fire of atheism, the blaze of modernity and the critical
scrutiny of psychoanalysis and science. What survives after all else
has been burnt away ... is the only kind of faith that resonates with
the spiritual needs of our extraordinary time.
The Church at this stage in its history preaches
unconditional love - and yet closes its doors to a host of
"unsuitable" people. It must perforce do this because its main
concern is with nurturing a doctrinal purity born out of its conviction
that it has access to final truth. It is therefore not surprising that
people of genuine faith, commitment and integrity are ruthlessly
silenced.
The fact is that more and more people are willing
and able to leave the wasteland of traditional religion for the fertile
edges of belief. Jeremy Young, for example, is one who proposes that
... we take our stand on uncertainty and on a
return to the ancient theological insight that the forms of the Christian
religion cannot contain or adequately express the mystery of God ...
in essence the knowledge of God is experiential not conceptual [6].
Living at the edge of belief requires that New
Believers may have to put aside inherited beliefs - or reconstruct them
in the light of discerning reflection and experience.
This experience can be costly, unsettling and
painful because it requires change at the very deepest levels of our
being - which brings us back to the word "revolution".
It turns out in the end that if a spiritual
revolution is happening in our times, it is one which will come about
primarily within ourselves.
____________________________________________________
[1] The Spiritual Revolution, Blackwell, 2005
[2] In Spiritus, the Journal of the Society for the Study of
Christian Spirituality
[3] By Rachel Kohn
[4] Bishop Richard Harries in The Guardian newspaper
[5] Fragments of the Spirit
[6] The Cost of Certainty
[Back]
|